Why AI Startups Embracing the 996 Workweek May Be Sabotaging Themselves

Chasing productivity through burnout is backfiring—and the research proves it’s a losing strategy for tech innovation

Just launched your new business and need resources to ace direct marketing at lower costs with higher ROI?

Check out Salesfully’s course, Mastering Sales Fundamentals for Long-Term Success, designed to help you attract new customers efficiently and affordably.

Explore more free courses

---

In a bid to maintain competitive momentum in artificial intelligence, some U.S.-based startups are beginning to mirror the infamous 996 work culture—a reference to working 9 a.m. to 9 p.m., six days a week, popularized in China’s tech industry. While this schedule is worn as a badge of honor by some, mounting research indicates that it may do more harm than good.

The 996 model was most prominently defended by Alibaba’s Jack Ma, who once remarked, "If you do not put out more time and energy than others, how can you achieve the success you want?" However, critics of this culture point out its correlation with rising burnout, declining mental health, and reduced creative output—factors crucial to AI development and strategic thinking.

The Hidden Costs of Overwork

According to a Stanford study, employee productivity sharply declines after working more than 50 hours per week. Those logging 70+ hours produce little more than those working 55. In a field like AI, where deep thinking and long-term vision are key, this drop in marginal productivity is particularly consequential.

Furthermore, a recent World Health Organization study found that long working hours are linked to an increased risk of stroke and heart disease. These findings are particularly relevant to startups trying to attract and retain top-tier technical talent, many of whom now place a premium on work-life balance.

“Overworking smart people doesn't make them smarter,” says Adam Grant, Wharton professor and author of Think Again. “It just makes them tired.”

AI Needs Clarity, Not Chaos

While speed is often cited as a strategic necessity in AI development, it must be weighed against human cognitive limits. High-pressure environments may accelerate short-term shipping cycles but can hinder long-term innovation.

The most successful breakthroughs—such as GPT-style large language models—were the result of years of methodical research, often from institutions that prized structured work and rest.

In contrast, a “grind culture” leads to higher employee turnover, which itself adds drag to any R&D operation. High attrition rates, particularly among engineers and data scientists, delay release timelines and increase training costs.

Global Pushback Against the 996 Model

In 2021, Chinese regulators clamped down on excessive work culture with a formal statement that 996 violates labor laws. Ironically, while the U.S. tech industry experiments with this model, the country that originated it is moving away from it. And for good reason.

Companies like Basecamp and Atlassian have demonstrated that asynchronous workflows, reduced meetings, and clearer goals often produce better results than clock-punching marathons.

Where the Future is Headed

Rather than emulating burnout, smart AI startups are looking toward models that promote deep work, autonomy, and mental well-being. Experiments in 4-day workweeks show promising outcomes: increased focus, lower absenteeism, and even higher revenue per employee.

And when it comes to AI, efficiency matters more than intensity.

Just launched your new business and need resources to ace direct marketing at lower costs with higher ROI?

Check out Salesfully’s course, Mastering Sales Fundamentals for Long-Term Success, designed to help you attract new customers efficiently and affordably.

Don't stop there! Create your free Salesfully account today and gain instant access to premium sales data and essential resources to fuel your startup journey.